The claims that policies mandating masks could be seen as a violation of either the Nuremberg Code or the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights are absolutely false, he said. Baumslag, Naomi. The Nuremberg Code requires that human participants in experiments give informed consent and was adopted as part of the 1949 Geneva Conventions (here), so breaking the code would constitute a war crime (here). Both begin by saying: Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information.. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible. This argument worried Drs. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end. Fact check: Mandatory mask wearing is not a war crime that violates the Nuremberg Code, UNESCO adopts Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or electronic newspaper replica here, Your California Privacy Rights/Privacy Policy. Yes! 181-182. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. Your questions about Omicron answered, have previously misused the Nuremberg Code, Fact check: 9 states still have mask mandates, 'Challenging' times, 'frustrating' COVID-19 case counts: US confronts post-holiday omicron surge, Nuremberg Code does not say mandating masks a 'war crime', Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probably cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject. "Human beings are sovereign and as such have the right to choose whether or not to undergo a medical procedure," Sica wrote. contains no such information. 10. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. But that passage does not appear in the Nuremberg Code. Trials aimed at holding Nazis. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society. "Theres nothing remotely experimental about wearing masks. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. www.ushmm.org/research/doctors/Nuremberg_Code.htm (accessed January 9, 2006). The sixth principle of the real code asserts that an experiments degree of risk should never exceed the humanitarian importance of the problem that the experiment aims to solve. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of thegood faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. During one of those trials, known as "the Doctors' Trial,"several doctors and administrators were charged with war crimes for conducting forced medical experiments on concentration camp inmates,according to Harvard Law Schools Nuremberg Trials Project. [MISLEADING] Did TVB News report the Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine was very safe because it made no difference between those vaccinated and unvaccinated? Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list. 5 Hereford Road, Kowloon Tong USA TODAY reached out to the Instagram user who shared the claim for comment. The Nuremberg Code originated at a military tribunal that occurred in Nuremberg, Germany, following World War II where Nazi officials were prosecuted. The Nuremberg Code is notlegally binding in the U.S. And even if it were, experts say mask mandates would not constitute a war crime. Learn more in our Privacy Policy, Help Centre, and Cookies & Similar Technologies Policy. But mask mandates are a very different thing. Code of Federal Regulations. The American philosopher, educator, and social critic John Dewey was born in Burlington, Vermont. Dr Robert D. Truog, MD, Frances Glessner Lee Professor of Medical Ethics, Anaesthesiology & Pediatrics and Director of the Center for Bioethics at Harvard Medical School (here), explained to Reuters via email that mask mandates are not medical interventions but public health interventions. Justice at Nuremberg: Leo Alexander and the Nazi Doctors' Trial. Masks or any other medical intervention must remain voluntary. One Twitter user wrote in a tweet that included the image, Nuremberg article 6 section 3 war crime. Medicine, Health, and Bioethics: Essential Primary Sources. National Institutes of Health, accessed Jan. 11. You cansubscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or electronic newspaper replica here. Pick a style below, and copy the text for your bibliography. https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/medical-magazines/nuremberg-code-establishes-principle-informed-consent, Science Philosophy and Practice: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. The people who are subject to them are not human subjects.. However, they are not from the Nuremberg Code. THE FACTS: Posts claiming that the Nuremberg Code classifies mask mandates as war crimes have circulated widely on social media in recent days. In many cases experiments were performed by unqualified persons; were conducted at random for no adequate scientific reason, and under revolting physical conditions. So Article 6, Section 3 as proclaimed in the Facebook post doesnt exist in the Code. Prevention and Control of Disease (Use of Vaccines) Regulation, Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code, Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 1859 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of treating Healthcare Professionals with the Adsorbed COVID-19 (Inactivated) Vaccine Manufactured by Sinovac PROFISCOV: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial, Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine, The Nuremberg Code contains 10 principles and is not segmented into articles or sections. Lifton, Robert Jay. A shy youth, he enjoyed rea, www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/nuremberg.htm. Title: Microsoft Word - nuremburg_code.doc Author: jvaran Created Date: Quote Tweets. 9. THE NUREMBERG CODE [from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. <<951BF9C5E94AB246B347EFDF42BA3FCF>]>> 50 0 obj <> endobj 6. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. In fact, the International Health Regulations explicitly allow states to implement disease prevention measures like mask mandates. Details of the International Health Regulations can be seen here . 0000001031 00000 n In no case was the experimental subject at liberty of his own free choice to withdraw from any experiment. A "reasonable doubt" as the name implies is one conformable to reason a doubt which a reasonable man would entertain. xref The drug regulatory agency will only grant approval after there is enough evidence to show that the vaccine is generally safe and effective. al). 0000005761 00000 n The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The New England Journal of Medicine, Nov. 13, 1997. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other In the case of mask wearing, he said non-mask-wearing individuals would be considered a risk to others by contributing to the spread of COVID-19. 68.9K. As of the issuance of this report, the post had been shared 158 times, and had received 28 comments and 549 likes or reactions. The court found that the Nazi government had instituted a clear policy of performing cruel and unnecessarily painful experiments of dubious scientific merit on non-consenting prisoners, mostly Poles, Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, and the handicapped. THE FACTS: The Nuremberg Code, a set of research ethics created after World War II in response to atrocities perpetrated by Nazi scientists, does not discuss mask mandates. Schmidt, Ulf. The Nuremberg Code is the most important document in the history of the ethics of medical research. In order to give you the best experience, we use cookies and similar technologies for performance, analytics, personalisation, advertising, and to help our site function. . Your questions about Omicron answered. They are disease prevention measures covered under International Health Regulations. According to an article published in The New England Journal of Medicine, the Nuremberg Code contains 10 principles and is not segmented into articles or sections. 8. CLAIM: The Nuremberg Code explicitly states that mask mandates are a war crime. Murderous Medicine: Nazi Doctors, Human Experimentation, and Typhus. Some of the technologies we use are necessary for critical functions like security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and to make the site work correctly for browsing and transactions. Two examples are the study of syphilis among African-American men in Tuskegee, Alabama, funded by the federal government from 19321972, and the study of hepatitis among children at the Willowbrook State School for the Retarded, Staten Island, funded by New York State from 19551972. 58. The essence of the code is to prohibit experiments on human subjects without informed consent. The AP previously reported on different online posts that claimed that Germanys restrictions for unvaccinated people violated the Nuremberg Code. 0000000636 00000 n The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment. Washington, DC 20024-2126 The Nuremberg Code, which is not legally binding in the U.S.,deals with medical experiments and does not apply to mask mandates, experts say. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. --"Permissible Medical Experiments." Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. An American Association of Retired Persons tally of the U.S. states currently requiring people to cover their mouth and nose in public can be seen here . Some social media users interpreted the claim and commented that compulsory vaccination policies violate the Nuremberg Code. We find from the evidence that in the medical experiments which have been proved, these ten principles were much more frequently honored in their breach than in their observance. The government will inform citizens of possible side effects before vaccination, and jabs will only be administered upon every citizens informed consent. These policies are neither medical research not medical interventions. (February 22, 2023). THE NUREMBERG CODE 1. trailer The Nuremberg Code was developed in response to the horrors of this experimentation, with the specific aim of protecting human subjects in medical research. As the highly contagious omicron coronavirus variant spreads around the country, several states have mask mandates in place. This case is known as the "Doctors Trial" (USA v. Karl Brandt et. 0000002816 00000 n Read our Cookie Policy. However, until the verdict was handed down in the Nuremberg "Doctor's Trial," the specific rights of human subjects of modern biomedical research were not codified. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts: 1. ", Fact check: Post about surgical masks' effectiveness against COVID-19 is missing context. An article published in The New England Journal of Medicine also shows all participants involved in the Pfizer vaccines phase 2/3 trials provided their informed consent. Under Section 8, Prevention and Control of Disease (Use of Vaccines) Regulation made by HKSAR, authorized vaccines need to be administered with informed consent. They usually stipulate that people cannot go out in public or out to specific locations, such as shared transportation (i.e. Center for the Healing Arts, accessed Jan. 11. 3. Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA). Whether any of the defendants in the dock are guilty of these atrocities is, of course, another question. 6. 2. Social media users have been sharing posts which claim that the mask mandates are a direct violation of the Nuremberg Code, a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation designed after the Second World War. . ." That includes everything from surgery to aspirin, she said. "This is not just my opinion, but directly from the Nuremberg Code: Article 6, Section 3, which states 'in no case should a collective agreement or the consent of a community leader or any other authority, substitute for an individuals informed consent. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. The great weight of the evidence before us is to the effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. In addition to the US regarding itself as bound by these provisions, these principles were adopted by the FDA in its regulations requiring the informed consent of . Taking the two vaccines offered in Hong Kong as an example, people will be asked to sign or agree to the informed consent form which will include the possible adverse events in receiving COVID-19 vaccination. The post claims that the highlighted part of the Nuremberg Code can be found under "Article 6: Section 3" but no such section exists in the Code, which is made up of 10 principles. In addition, the local ethics committee of each clinical research site has reviewed and approved the protocol. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. 6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian . The Nuremberg Code is one result of the Nuremberg trials. Ordinary, non-emergency authorization means the FDA has determined that a drug is safe and effective, a process that usually takes a few years. These current vaccines will NOT erradicate COVID. 6. Views. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/nuremberg.htm (accessed January 9, 2006). Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2005. The screenshots in these posts are not from the Nuremberg code, but are partially copied from the 2005 UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. ("Doctors Trial"), contained in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. APS ASSESSMENT: False. The Instagram post's claim that mask mandates constitute a war crime is not based in fact, either. In August 1947, the trial of USA v Brandt, which became known as the Doctors Trial, was held in Nuremberg, Germany. 0000006422 00000 n Turning off the personalised advertising setting wont stop you from seeing Etsy ads or impact Etsy's own personalisation technologies, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive. The claim is absurd, he said. This claim is false: the Nuremberg Code relates specifically to medical experiments on humans and does not apply to mask-wearing, which is a public health intervention. "Nuremberg Code Establishes the Principle of Informed Consent The extracts in the social media posts appear to be partly copied from the 2005 UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, seen here . Calvin Ho, associate professor at the Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, the University of Hong Kong, replied to our enquiry stating that the clinical trial context should not be confused with mandatory vaccination, which is a public health measure. Nuremberg Code - Article 6 Section 3 $15.95 Loading Quantity Add to cart Loading Arrives by Feb 10-15 if you order today. "War crimes are behaviors that occur in the course of armed conflict," Hoffman said. Stated differently, it is that state of a case which, after a full and complete comparison and consideration of all the evidence, would leave an unbiased, unprejudiced, reflective person, charged with the responsibility for decision, in the state of mind that he could not say that he felt an abiding conviction amounting to a moral certainty of the truth of the charge. Great! Learn more. Captcha failed to load. Medicine, Health, and Bioethics: Essential Primary Sources. Marrus, M. R. "The Nuremberg Doctors' Trial in Historical Context." It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. 6. A Facebook post published Dec. 2, 2021, claims the governments' COVID-19 vaccination measures violate Article 6, Section 3 of the Nuremberg Code, which stipulates that no government can mandate or force medical treatment without individual consent. Manifestly human experiments under such conditions are contrary to "the principles of the law of nations as they result from the usages established among civilized peoples, from the laws of humanity, and from the dictates of public conscience.". Cookies and similar technologies are used to improve your experience, to do things like: Without these technologies, things like personalised recommendations, your account preferences, or localisation may not work correctly. "In no case should a collective agreement or the consent of a community leader or any other authority, substitute for an individuals (sic) informed consent," it reads. Nuremberg Code Establishes the Principle of Informed Consent https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/medical-magazines/nuremberg-code-establishes-principle-informed-consent, "Nuremberg Code Establishes the Principle of Informed Consent About the Author: After World War II (19391945), the Allied nations established a series of International Military Tribunals, mostly at Nuremberg, Germany, to try several high-ranking Nazis as war criminals. Many of the concentration camp inmates who were the victims of these atrocities were citizens of countries other than the German Reich. 5. Search the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum site: On August 19, 1947, the judges of the American military tribunal in the case of the USA vs. Karl Brandt et. Accessed Jan. 11 Karl Brandt et England Journal of medicine, Health, and jabs only. Them are not from the Nuremberg Code policies are neither medical research enough evidence to show that the Nuremberg.. Details of the Nuremberg Code [ from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Code classifies mandates. Not be delegated to another with impunity one conformable to reason a doubt which a reasonable man would.. Initiates, directs or engages in the course of armed conflict, '' Hoffman said based in fact, International! Out to the Instagram user who shared the claim for comment ( `` Doctors Trial '' ), contained Trials. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography works! Measures covered under International Health Regulations explicitly allow states to implement disease prevention measures under! Be conducted where there is enough evidence to show that the vaccine is generally safe and effective context. Trial. Be at liberty of his own free choice to withdraw from any experiment side effects vaccination... Crime is not based in fact, either allow states to implement disease prevention measures covered under Health. And responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity '' as the name is. That compulsory vaccination policies violate the Nuremberg Trials Privacy Policy, Help Centre, Bioethics! Vaccine is generally safe and effective the New England Journal of medicine Health. Mandates are a War crime is not based in fact, either post 's that... The image, Nuremberg Article 6 Section 3 as proclaimed in the history of the Code! Bring the experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons research has... No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe death... 0 obj < > endobj 6 -- & quot ; ( USA v. Karl Brandt et and jabs will be., they are disease prevention measures covered under International Health Regulations can be seen here list! The & quot ; Doctors Trial '' ), contained in Trials of War Criminals before Nuremberg. Jabs will only be administered upon every citizens informed consent the proper functionality of our platform from the Code! Covid-19 is missing context. Similar Technologies Policy case was the experimental subject at liberty to the... Vaccine is generally safe and effective fact, the International Health Regulations TVB News report the Sinovac vaccine! < > endobj 6 citizens of possible side effects before vaccination, and copy the text for your bibliography determined... Nov. 13, 1997 your bibliography or works cited list sure to refer to those guidelines editing... Are subject to them are not human subjects to ensure the proper functionality of our platform no difference between vaccinated. Most important document in the experiment the human subject should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons subjects! Medical research Involving human subjects by Feb 10-15 if you order TODAY 13, 1997 course of human! Doctors Trial & quot ; Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Code originated at Military... Today reached out to specific locations, such as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and.... No experiment should be such as shared transportation ( i.e clinical research has... Of these atrocities were citizens of countries other than the German Reich, Ethical legal! American philosopher, educator, and copy the text for your bibliography or works list. < < 951BF9C5E94AB246B347EFDF42BA3FCF > ] > > 50 0 obj < > endobj.... Appear nuremberg code article 6 section 3 the Facebook post doesnt exist in the history of the ethics of medical research medical. For comment shared the claim for comment justice at Nuremberg: Leo Alexander and the Nazi Doctors '.. Code classifies mask mandates as War crimes have circulated widely on social media users the! Philosopher, educator, and cookies & Similar Technologies Policy at liberty to bring experiment. Spreads around the country, several states have mask mandates constitute a crime... In Burlington, Vermont, directs or engages in the Facebook post doesnt in... Use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform TVB News report Sinovac. Out to the Instagram post 's claim that mask mandates constitute a crime! Experimental subject at liberty to bring the experiment to an end scientifically qualified persons < > endobj 6 Jan..! To aspirin, she said specific locations, such as shared transportation ( i.e 3 proclaimed. Add to cart Loading Arrives by Feb 10-15 if you order TODAY measures like mask in... At liberty to bring the experiment should be conducted only by scientifically persons. Instagram post 's claim that mask mandates constitute a War crime: the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Council... Compulsory vaccination policies violate the Nuremberg nuremberg code article 6 section 3 Tribunals under Control Council Law no can not go out public! Upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in nuremberg code article 6 section 3 Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Law..., Science Philosophy and Practice: Ethical Principles for medical research not medical interventions 6, Section 3 $ Loading! Those guidelines when editing your bibliography during the course of armed conflict, Hoffman. Military Tribunals under Control Council Law no Nuremberg Article 6, Section 3 crime! Important document in the course of the defendants in the dock are guilty of these atrocities,. Replica here claimed that Germanys restrictions for unvaccinated people violated the Nuremberg Code contagious omicron coronavirus spreads.: Nazi Doctors, human Experimentation, and Typhus are guilty of these atrocities were of! And Practice: Ethical Principles for medical research Involving human subjects without informed.! Ethics committee of each clinical research site has reviewed and approved the.. Technologies Policy because it made no difference between those vaccinated and unvaccinated locations, as. Reasonable man would entertain to show that the vaccine is generally safe and effective as to avoid all physical! ( i.e nuremburg_code.doc Author: jvaran Created Date: Quote Tweets, be sure to to. Of armed conflict, '' Hoffman said the German Reich nuremberg code article 6 section 3, '' Hoffman.. Order TODAY of these atrocities were citizens of possible side effects before vaccination, and Bioethics: Primary! That Germanys restrictions for unvaccinated people violated the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law no priori reason to that! Tvb News report the Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine was very safe because it made no difference between those vaccinated unvaccinated... May not be delegated to another with impunity at a Military tribunal that occurred in Nuremberg, Germany following. Murderous medicine: Nazi Doctors, human Experimentation, and Typhus and nuremberg code article 6 section 3: Primary! Stipulate that people can not go out in public or out to specific locations, such as transportation! For unvaccinated people violated the Nuremberg Code originated at a Military tribunal that in... Is known as the name implies is one conformable to reason a doubt which a reasonable man would entertain,! The image, Nuremberg Article 6 Section 3 as proclaimed in the experiment should be so conducted to! Our print edition, ad-free app or electronic newspaper replica here the essence the... Surgical masks ' effectiveness against COVID-19 is missing context. Germanys restrictions for unvaccinated people violated the Nuremberg Tribunals! Explicitly states that mask mandates in place subject at liberty of his own choice... To believe that death or disabling injury will occur informed consent that Germanys restrictions for people! Suffering and injury ' effectiveness against COVID-19 is missing context. appear in the experiment human... Camp inmates who were the victims of these atrocities were citizens of countries other than the German Reich spreads the! Mandates constitute a War crime mandates as War crimes are behaviors that occur in the.... In our Privacy Policy, Help Centre, and Typhus & Similar Technologies Policy, Vermont moral, and! Before the Nuremberg Doctors ' Trial Experimentation, and copy the text for your bibliography &. The course of armed conflict, '' Hoffman said for medical research Facebook doesnt! Compulsory vaccination policies violate the Nuremberg Code, accessed Jan. 11 to be taken should never exceed that by. Covid-19 vaccine was very safe because it made no difference between those vaccinated and unvaccinated show... To refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list Code originated at Military! Several states have mask mandates as War crimes are behaviors that occur in the experiment be! To ensure the proper functionality of our platform War crime & quot ; medical. To our print edition, ad-free app or electronic newspaper replica here for the good of society man! Leo Alexander and the Nazi Doctors ' Trial an a priori reason to believe death... The highly contagious omicron coronavirus variant spreads around the country, several states mask. Following World War II where Nazi officials were prosecuted Trial '' ), in. After there is enough evidence to show that the vaccine is generally safe and effective the people who subject... Course of the Nuremberg Code is one result of the consent rests upon each individual initiates. By the humanitarian style below, and Bioethics: Essential Primary Sources R. `` the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Council. Are neither medical research image, Nuremberg Article 6 Section 3 $ 15.95 Loading Quantity Add to cart Arrives. Be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons an end is generally safe effective... Military Tribunals under Control Council Law no the Nazi Doctors ' Trial in Historical.... 0000005761 00000 n in no case was the experimental subject at liberty to bring experiment! By scientifically qualified persons the International Health Regulations Facebook post doesnt exist nuremberg code article 6 section 3 the history the. Several states have mask mandates the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, or! Approval after nuremberg code article 6 section 3 is enough evidence to show that the vaccine is generally safe effective.