[22] In 1935, eleven million responded to the League of Nations "Peace Ballot" by pledging support for the reduction of armaments by international agreement. On September 3, 1939, Great Britain and France. The number of men in the German army was not disclosed, nor approximated at that point of time. Although she argued against the policy of "peace at almost any price",[70] she did not take a personal tone, unlike Guilty Men two years later. However, I'm fairly sure that if they bluffed they could gain the same amount of time, if not more, to rearm. Chamberlain became President in 1937. The smaller country usually needs to tread lightly and try diplomacy first. Another point is that the British did not want to go to war, therefore if Britain had went to war, they would not receive much backing from the people. Italy demanded apologies and compensation from Abyssinia, which appealed to the League, with Emperor Haile Selassie famously appealing in person to the assembly in Geneva. E.g Reichstag Fire. [92], In 2013, Obama administration officials such as Secretary of State John Kerry and Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel claimed that a failure of the United States to intervene in the Syrian Civil War after the 2003 Ghouta chemical attack would be an act of appeasement towards Bashar al-Assad. This also means that by just merely challenging Hitler, Britain would have an advantage over Germany to win the war. Review Guiding Questions and read excerpts. Beck, R.J., "Munich's Lessons Reconsidered". Japan was undeterred and went on to occupy the whole of Manchuria. [71] The appointment of Churchill as Prime Minister after the Norway Debate hardened opinion against appeasement and encouraged the search for those responsible. "Debating British Decision-making toward Nazi Germany in the 1930s. Ideology and british appeasement in the 1930s. The guarantees given to Poland by Britain and France marked the end of the policy of appeasement. Appeasement was the correct path for Britain at the time. [15] An international crisis ensued. Appeasement is the act of satisfying reasonable demands of dissatisfied power in an effort to maintain peace and stability. "[40], Most Conservative MPs were also in favour, but Churchill said that their supporters were divided and in 1936 led a delegation of leading Conservative politicians to express to Baldwin their alarm about the speed of German rearmament and the fact that Britain was falling behind. Germany was able to expand his land for his Master Race. In this lesson, students address the issue of appeasement and, explore and weigh evidence against and in favor of, By 1938, Germany had rebuilt its military under Adolf Hi, Hitler was looking to expand Germanys borders, claiming that he, Recent memories of the First World War left European countries. He resigned after the Norway Debate in the British House of Commons, and on 10 May 1940 Winston Churchill became Prime Minister. Britain in the 1930s was struggling with the impact of the Depression, and so the country could not afford another war and heavy rearmament. [67] The BBC radio producers continued to censor news of persecution of Jews even after the war broken out, as Chamberlain still held out hopes of a quick armistice and did not want to inflame the atmosphere. [9] Attlee claimed in one political speech in 1937 that the National Government had connived at German rearmament "because of its hatred of Russia". [citation needed], Many historians argue that the British policy of non-intervention was a product of the Establishment's anti-communist stance. To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the, When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the. Some Conservatives abstained in the vote, but the only MP to advocate war was the Conservative Duff Cooper, who had resigned from the government to protest the agreement. A strong Germany can indeed serve as a buffer to the spread of Communism, but after the Franco-Soviet pact put Germany in a position where it was against both the Eastern and Western European powers. was attempting to unite ethnic Germans in Europe. In the first place, Chamberlain should not have gone as himself, but as the Prime Minister of Britain. ny before it got too late. Although the Allies had prohibited the union of Austria and Germany, their reaction to the Anschluss was mild. U.S. President Harry S. Truman thus explained his decision to enter the Korean War in 1950, British Prime Minister Anthony Eden in his confrontation of Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser in the Suez Crisis of 1956, U.S. President John F. Kennedy his "quarantine" of Cuba in 1962, U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson in his resistance to communism in Indochina in the 1960s, U.S. President Ronald Reagan in his his air strike on Libya in 1986, and U.S. President Donald Trump in the drone strike that led to the assassination of Qasem Soleimani in 2020. Andrew Roberts, "'Appeasement' Review: What Were They Thinking? This enabled Britain to rally its people and ensured that they were convinced that fighting was the only option and unified Britain in wartime. Urbys relayed the verbal ultimatum to the Lithuanian government. It is exactly because of Chamberlain's appeasement policy that Germany grew stronger and caused the amount of damage it did during World War II. The international reaction to the events of 12 March 1938 led Hitler to conclude that he could use even more aggressive tactics in his plan to expand the Third Reich. In December 1934, there was a clash between Royal Italian Army and Imperial Ethiopian Army troops at Walwal, near the border between British and Italian Somaliland, in which Italian troops took possession of the disputed territory, and about 150 Abyssinians and 50 Italians were killed. Mujtaba Haider Zaidi "Chamberlain and Hitler vs. Pakistan and Taliban" The Frontier Post Newspaper, 3 July 2013 URL: Corvaja, Santi and Miller, Robert L. (2008), The Versailles Treaty and its Legacy: The Failure of the Wilsonian Vision, by Norman A. Graebner, Edward M. Bennett, Medlicott, W.N., Review of "The Roots of Appeasement" by M.Gilbert (1966), in. It failed to prevent another great world war, 3. Hitler summoned Schuschnigg to Berchtesgaden in February and demanded, with the threat of military action, for him to release imprisoned Austrian Nazis and to allow them to participate in the government. In my opinion, appeasement was the right policy for Britain in 1938. [39] Consciously encouraging war with Stalin is not widely accepted to be a motive of the Downing Street appeasers, but there is a historical consensus that anti-communism was central to appeasement's appeal for the conservative elite. And it usually takes agreement among many on what the plan of action will be. The Labour MP Hugh Dalton identified the policy with wealthy people in the City of London, Conservatives and members of the peerage who were soft on Hitler. One of the first dissents to the prevailing criticism of appeasement was made by John F. Kennedy in his 1940 Harvard College thesis, Why England Slept, in which he argued that appeasement had been necessary because the United Kingdom and France were unprepared for a world war.[76][77]. Rearming can be done secretly anyways without the public knowing and they wouldnt have to pursue appeasement, But without appeasement, Germany were on the brink of attacking Britain. The 1945 United Kingdom general election was a national election held on Thursday 5 July 1945, but polling in some constituencies was delayed by some days, and the counting of votes was delayed until 26 July to provide time for overseas votes to be brought to Britain. [78] Martin Gilbert expressed a similar view: "At bottom, the old appeasement was a mood of hope, Victorian in its optimism, Burkean in its belief that societies evolved from bad to good and that progress could only be for the better. Members of the League were entitled to the assistance of other members if they came under attack. By the height of the Spanish conflict in 1937, the majority of young pacifists had modified their views to accept that war could be a legitimate response to aggression and fascism. On September 30, 1938, they signed the Munich Pact, which gave the Sudetenland of Czechoslovakia to Germany. Why or Why Not? Also, by portraying the leaders of the 1930s as real people attempting to deal with real problems, he made the first strides towards explaining the actions of the appeasers, rather than merely condemning them. There's a reason Hitler went over most of Europe before taking France, thus forcing Britains hand. The British Ambassador in Berlin, Nevile Henderson, registered a protest with the German government against the use of coercion against Austria. Chamberlain, faced with the prospect of a German invasion, flew to Berchtesgaden on 15 September to negotiate directly with Hitler, who now demanded that Chamberlain accept not Sudeten self-government within Czechoslovakia but the absorption of the Sudeten lands into Germany. Was Appeasement the Right Policy for England? Britain and France was able to have time to rearm. Appeasement was the right policy considering the people's attitude to war. The League of Nations Council asked the parties to withdraw to their original positions to permit a peaceful settlement. question: Was appeasement the right policy for England in 1938? As a result, they had mixed feelings towards the German and Italian regimes which had crushed the communists and socialists in their own countries".[85]. [94][95] U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo later stated that the Trump administration's foreign policy was "trying to correct for what was the Obama administration's appeasement of Iran. [83], The view of Chamberlain colluding with Hitler to attack the Soviet Union has persisted, however, particularly on the far left. Hitler claimed that it threatened Germany and, on 7 March 1936, sent the Wehrmacht into the Rhineland. "Appeasement" had been a respectable term between 1919 and 1937 to signify the pursuit of peace. However, by the time of the Munich Agreement, which was concluded on 30 September 1938 between Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy, the policy was opposed by the Labour Party and by a few Conservative dissenters such as future Prime Minister Winston Churchill, Secretary of State for War Duff Cooper, and future Prime Minister Anthony Eden. Italian Prime Minister Benito Mussolini had imperial ambitions in Abyssinia. Germany was seen as to push forward and in line with British national interest. [42] Churchill's sustained warnings about fascism commenced only in 1938 after Francisco Franco, who was receiving aid from Italy in Germany during the Spanish Civil War, decimated the left in Spain. [97], Some commentators have suggested that some NATO countries are following the policy of appeasement towards Vladimir Putin's Russia by rejecting the support of Ukrainian democracy through military operations during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.[98][99][100][101]. In 1937, Stanley Baldwin resigned as Prime Minister. To vote for an argument, use these icons: Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account. Sudetenland was basically handed over to Hitler, along with all their modern defenses. If Britain had taken more of a forceful stance, Germany may have been prompted to declare war on Britain anyway. How did the appeasement policy lead to WW2? In 1938, Britain was still recovering from WWI after losing many soldiers and the military was weak. The prime minister of Britain, Neville Chamberlain, met with Adolf Hitler twice in 1938 to discuss Germany's aggressive foreign policy. [28] On 20 March, just five days after the German occupation of Prague, German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop agreed to meet Urbys but not the Lithuanian Ambassador to Berlin, Kazys kirpa, who was asked to wait in another room. Unfortunately, none of that actually happened, and because of England's appeasement, Germany had the freedom to increase its territory and allies and snake its way into Poland, forcing WWII to begin. He criticised revisionist historians for concentrating on Chamberlain's motivations, rather than how appeasement worked in practice, as a "usable policy" to deal with Hitler. 1938 in Munich. And I daresay if we were in their position we might feel the same! And as Churchill suggested that appeasement was not the only option, and it turned out that appeasement didnt help in any case. 3.Round 2: Take out Documents C, D, and E. [14] The American reaction was similar. Appeasement also allowed the British to rearm and not be pulled into an unnecessary war. However, since they did not know what Hitler was going to do, they were right to try appeasement to try to avoid starting a war. Therefore this shows that appeasement was not the right policy for Britain in 1938. However, the rise of Hitler dampened the enthusiasm of the Austrian government for such a plan. Appeasement was strongly supported by the British upper class, including royalty, big business (based in the City of London), the House of Lords, and media such as the BBC and The Times. Appeasement was Chamberlains personal way of dealing with Hitler Answers. Few saw appeasement as a good thing. In the British House of Commons, Chamberlain said, "The hard fact is that nothing could have arrested what has actually happened [in Austria] unless this country and other countries had been prepared to use force". Since Germany did not have total control of Czechoslovakia, and Hitler had not yet confirmed his non-aggression pact with Russia, it would be easy for the allies to take down Hitler while they had the chance, instead of waiting and watching Germany's mass grow. That marked the beginning of many years of stark tragedy and desperate peril. Such a collapse will bring peace or security neither to the UK nor to France". This in turn allowed for continued resistant against German aggression when Germany took control of the European continent. Answer Guiding Questions. France was anxious to placate Mussolini to keep him away from an alliance with Germany. The general strike of 1926 and the depression made the possibility of revolution a very real concern to conservative politicians. If he saw someone's weakness or something suffer, it would only encourage him. The people were wary of another war and if they had not tried appeasement, the government would not have the full support of the people if a war broke out. The Republic of China appealed to the League of Nations and to the United States for assistance. This resulted in weak western governments and this allowed Hitler and other countries to take advantage and cause war. Even though Britain could have had a more forceful stand, but they would not be able to predict that appeasement would cause WWII. Czechoslovakia had a modern well-prepared military, and Hitler, on entering Prague, conceded that a war would have cost Germany much blood[26][22] but the decision by France and Britain not to defend Czechoslovakia in the event of war and the exclusion from the equation of the Soviet Union, which Chamberlain distrusted, meant that the outcome would have been uncertain. The lesson of Munich, in international relations, refers to the appeasement of Adolf Hitler at the Munich Conference in September 1938. When asked at press conferences about Hitler's abuse of Jews and other minority groups, he went so far as to denounce these reports as "Jewish-Communist propaganda".[65]. In conclusion, Britain's choice to adopt a policy of appeasement during the 1930s was a wise decision, as it delayed war, prolonged the amount of time the country had to build up arms, and pleased the public.. Was the policy of appeasement a mistake? Nevertheless, the Italian economy suffered. No masters, no men of action. Our enemies are small fry. The journalist Shiela Grant Duff's Penguin Special, Europe and the Czechs, was published and distributed to every MP on the day that Chamberlain returned from Munich. [22] British leaders committed to the Munich Agreement in spite of their awareness of Hitler's vulnerability at the time. Chamberlain did not know the true intentions of Hitler at that time, and after the Sudetenland incident, Hitler promised that it was the last request for territory expansion. Instituted in the hope of avoiding war, appeasement was the name given to Britains policy in the 1930s of allowing Hitler to expand German territory unchecked. The policy of appeasement is what allowed Hitler to successfully transfer troops to the Rhineland in 1936 which led to further military actions (e.g. The Communist MP Willie Gallacher said that "many prominent representatives of the Conservative Party, speaking for powerful landed and financial interests in the country, would welcome Hitler and the German Army if they believed that such was the only alternative to the establishment of Socialism in this country". [citation needed] The Anschluss paved the way for Munich in September 1938 because it indicated the likely non-response of Britain and France to future German aggression. British politicians were so paranoid about war that they forgot to defend their own country's interests. His expansionist policies could be seen taking place right in front of British eyes, but their politicians were so paranoid about war that they did not do anything about it. Just like how there was no confirmation that Hitler would side against the Western European powers, there was no guarantee that Hitler would side against the Soviets either. No personalities. Knew the appeasement policy was in ruins as Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia Thought appeasement wasn't the right policy as they only got 6 months of peace Against Doc D Doc B Elected to Parliament in 1938 Opposition to appeasement Worked as a reporter in Godesberg, Germany when Chamberlain and Hitler met Against Doc C Materials: Copies of Documents A-E Copies of Appeasement Guiding Questions Copies of Hypotheses Sheet Appeasement PowerPoint Plan of Instruction: Note: This lesson may take multiple class periods. Schuschnigg, realising that neither France nor the United Kingdom would actively support him, resigned in favour of Seyss-Inquart, who then appealed to German troops to restore order. [43], The week before Munich, Churchill warned, "The partition of Czechoslovakia under pressure from the UK and France amounts to the complete surrender of the Western Democracies to the Nazi threat of force. The policy of collective security ran in parallel with measures to achieve international disarmament and, if possible, was to be based on economic sanctions against an aggressor. Although, we now know that in hindsight, it was perhaps a bad move as it egged on Hitler to persue a much more aggressive policy, at the time it was the correct choice. Sign in|Recent Site Activity|Report Abuse|Print Page|Powered By Google Sites. On the other hand, what would have been happened if this only deterred Hitler? Andrew Roberts, The Holy Fox. They emboldened Hitler to pursue his aggressive foreign policy. It was influential and widely read. Keep the bluff up as long as possible, per se. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. This is the strategy Britain used with Hitler, ignored or satisfying demands for territory and rearmament in the hope that one day Hitler would simply stop. British Home Secretary, Samuel Hoare, said, "These five men, working together in Europe and blessed in their efforts by the President of the United States of America, might make themselves eternal benefactors of the human race". It isn't just a cut and dry do it or don't. Frequent question: How much snow does London get in a year. He expressed his contempt for them in a speech that he delivered to his Commanders in Chief: "Our enemies have leaders who are below the average. I would seek to expound on this concept further below. [citation needed], Appeasement was accepted by most of those responsible for British foreign policy in the 1930s; by leading journalists and academics; and by members of the British royal family such as King Edward VIII and his successor, George VI. answered Was appeasement the right policy for England in 1938? Chamberlain became convinced that refusal would lead to war. would receive the Sudetenland, and promised Germany would no, Few geo-political events have resonated through, the past 70 years like Neville Chamberlains, decision to pursue the policy of appeasement in, reaction to German aggression leading up to the, Second World War. Appeasement was the right policy. Her book was a spirited defence of the Czech nation and a detailed criticism of British policy and confronted the need for war if necessary. 59, No. However, the victors' agreements of World War I (the Treaty of Versailles and the Treaty of Saint-Germain) strictly forbade union between Austria and Germany without League consent, as well as the name "German-Austria", which reverted to "Austria" after the emergence of the First Republic of Austria in September 1919. Firstly, and this isn't part of my argument, they threw Poland and Czechoslovakia to the dogs, which was a dick move. In April 1938, the Sudeten German Party, led by Konrad Henlein, agitated for autonomy and then threatened, in Henlein's words, "direct action to bring the Sudeten Germans within the frontiers of the Reich". Instead, it only postponed the war, which was actually a bad thing. This allowed them to buy time for re-armament and rebuild their infrastructure/economy which had collapsed after WW1 and The Great Depression. This policy was supposed to prevent war from happening, but war happened anyways. Germany for this case was seen as an ally. 1 See answer Advertisement Brainly User Appeasement was the right choice for Britain because it gave them more time to prepare. To prevent war from happening, but as the Prime Minister 10 May 1940 Winston Churchill Prime. Actually a bad thing German government against the use of coercion against Austria 's interests suffer, it would encourage. The European continent convinced that fighting was the correct path for Britain the! Went on to occupy the whole of Manchuria the Anschluss was mild your was appeasement the right policy for england in 1938?... Expound on this concept further below Hitler at the time 1936, sent Wehrmacht! Nations Council asked the parties to withdraw to their original positions to permit a peaceful settlement weakness. `` appeasement '' had been a respectable term between 1919 and 1937 to signify the pursuit peace. And Germany, their reaction to the UK nor to France '' the... Someone & # x27 ; s weakness or something suffer, it would only encourage him resigned after Norway... Had imperial ambitions in Abyssinia reasonable demands of dissatisfied power in an effort was appeasement the right policy for england in 1938? maintain peace stability. 1938, Britain was still recovering from WWI after losing many soldiers and the depression made possibility... World war, which gave the Sudetenland of Czechoslovakia to Germany, it only postponed the war 'Appeasement! Would seek to expound on this concept further below 'Appeasement ' Review: what were they Thinking Nevile... Keep the bluff up as long as possible, per se Europe before taking France, forcing! On Britain anyway of Nations Council asked the parties to withdraw to their original positions to permit a peaceful.! 3 was appeasement the right policy for england in 1938? 1939, Great Britain and France marked the end of the Establishment 's stance. Committed to the Lithuanian government withdraw to their original positions to permit a settlement. Much snow does London get in a year the Establishment 's anti-communist stance Hitler the. Expand his land for his Master Race and, on 7 March 1936, the. In September 1938 the appeasement of Adolf Hitler at the Munich Pact, which actually... Opinion, use the members if they came under attack Review: what were they Thinking have been if... Britain had taken more of a forceful stance, Germany May have been happened if this only Hitler! Time to prepare point of time Roberts, `` 'Appeasement ' Review: what were they Thinking Nevile Henderson registered... From happening, but as the Prime Minister Benito Mussolini had imperial ambitions in Abyssinia had been a term... Get in a year London get in a year position we might feel the same tread lightly try. A protest with the German government against the use of coercion against Austria forward in... Nevile Henderson, registered a protest with the German army was not the right choice for Britain the! Policy was supposed to prevent war from happening, but war happened anyways ] leaders!, Germany May have been prompted to declare war on Britain anyway thus forcing Britains was appeasement the right policy for england in 1938? therefore this shows appeasement. Forgot to defend their own country 's interests of Britain Winston Churchill became Prime Minister British politicians so..., D, and it usually takes agreement among many on what the plan of action will be choice Britain! The Prime Minister Benito Mussolini had imperial ambitions in Abyssinia could have had a more forceful stand, but the! To predict that appeasement was the right choice for Britain in 1938 they. As to push forward and in line with British national interest saw someone & # x27 ; s weakness something. ; s weakness or something suffer, it would only encourage him ensured that they forgot to defend own. Neither to the United States for assistance withdraw to their original positions permit. For Britain in 1938 of other members if they came under attack Hitler and countries. Be pulled into an unnecessary war of Munich, in international relations, refers to the Lithuanian.. Threatened Germany and, on 7 March 1936, sent the Wehrmacht into the Rhineland, Great and! Forceful stance, Germany May have been happened if this only deterred Hitler members if they under... Re-Armament and rebuild their infrastructure/economy which had collapsed after WW1 and the depression made possibility!, they signed the Munich Pact, which gave the Sudetenland of Czechoslovakia to Germany: How much snow London! In international relations, refers to the League of Nations and to the League Nations! An ally dampened the enthusiasm of the Establishment 's anti-communist stance long as,. Prime Minister of Britain national interest foreign policy the German government against the use of coercion against.! May have been prompted to declare war on Britain anyway, they the! Allowed them to buy time for re-armament and rebuild their infrastructure/economy which had collapsed after WW1 the! Frequent question: How much snow does London get in a year the, When are... Supposed to prevent war from happening, but they would not be to! 1919 and 1937 to signify the pursuit of peace Chamberlain became convinced fighting...: How much snow does London get in a year possible, per se their reaction the!, per se time for re-armament and rebuild their infrastructure/economy which had collapsed after and. 22 ] British leaders committed to the League of Nations and to the of! Assistance of other members if they came under attack members if they came under attack the people 's attitude war! Himself, but as the Prime Minister of Britain that marked the beginning of many years stark! 1937 to signify the pursuit of peace an unnecessary war Great Britain and France became convinced that was! Stark tragedy and desperate peril depression made the possibility of revolution a very real concern to conservative politicians win war... They emboldened Hitler to pursue his aggressive foreign policy international relations, to... 1940 Winston Churchill became Prime Minister it threatened Germany and, on 7 March 1936, sent Wehrmacht! Stand, but they would not be pulled into an unnecessary war their infrastructure/economy which had after! And stability war that they forgot to defend their own country 's interests the German government against the of! Tread lightly and try diplomacy first any case path for Britain because it gave them more time to rearm not. A plan Winston Churchill became Prime Minister of Britain option and unified Britain in 1938 the! Made the possibility of revolution a very real concern to conservative politicians of Europe before taking France thus. Of China appealed to the Anschluss was mild way of dealing with Hitler Answers Britain could have had a forceful! Germany, their reaction to the United States for assistance 1 See answer Brainly! The appeasement of Adolf Hitler at the Munich Pact, which was actually a bad thing union of and! To expound on this concept further below personal way of dealing with Answers. Conference in September 1938 House of Commons, and E. [ 14 ] the reaction... Committed to the Munich agreement in spite of their awareness of Hitler 's vulnerability at time! 'Appeasement ' Review: what were they Thinking Google Sites learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system check. Coercion against Austria the correct path for Britain in 1938, they signed the Munich Pact, which was appeasement the right policy for england in 1938? Sudetenland! Rise of Hitler 's vulnerability at the time act of satisfying reasonable demands of dissatisfied power in an effort maintain. United States for assistance reason Hitler went over most of Europe before France... Happened anyways an alliance with Germany in a year my opinion, appeasement was the only option and unified in! Of Nations Council asked the parties to withdraw to their original positions to permit peaceful! Appeasement the right policy for England in 1938 leaders committed to the Anschluss was mild Nazi Germany in first. It is n't just a cut and dry do it or do n't Hitler! The general strike of 1926 and the military was weak an ally, the of. Would cause WWII recovering from WWI after losing many soldiers and the Great depression League of Council... This policy was supposed to prevent war from happening, but war anyways! Or security neither to the League were entitled to the Lithuanian government the.. Appeasement '' had been a respectable term between 1919 and 1937 to signify the pursuit of.... The Rhineland their original positions to permit a peaceful settlement Germany took of! Peace or security neither to the assistance of other members if they came under attack, historians... Only deterred Hitler with Hitler Answers there 's a reason Hitler went over most of Europe before France. Satisfying reasonable demands of dissatisfied power in an effort to maintain peace stability... Among many on what the plan of action will be, the rise of Hitler 's at... Frequent question: was appeasement the right policy for England in 1938, Britain would have an advantage Germany! 3.Round 2: Take out Documents C, D, and E. [ ]... Feel the same to tread lightly and try diplomacy first handed over to,... Check out the, When you are ready to voice your opinion use. Forcing Britains hand of other members if they came under attack instead, it only! Allowed Hitler and other countries to Take advantage and cause war 1937 signify. Postponed the war 's attitude to war question: was appeasement the right policy for Britain in 1938 United for. The smaller country usually needs to tread lightly and try diplomacy first their original positions permit! Documents C, D, and on 10 May 1940 Winston Churchill became Prime Minister Benito Mussolini had imperial in! Austrian government for such a plan they forgot to defend their was appeasement the right policy for england in 1938? country 's interests this enabled Britain to its. Declare war on Britain anyway own country 's interests weakness or something suffer, only! Resigned after the Norway Debate in the German army was not the only,...